Philosophy 410: Philosophy of Religion
Monday, May 5, 2014
Wednesday, April 30, 2014
Final Exams
Our final exam time is Monday, May 5 at 1-3. Please be here at one to give us a preview, or the complete version, of your final paper: what arguments are you discussing, what's your verdict on the arguments, who makes the better case, etc?
Final exam writing project is due by Wednesday at noon by Turnitin. MAKE IT VERY CLEAR ON YOUR ASSIGNMENT IF YOU ARE, OR HOPE TO BE, A GRADUATING SENIOR.
Course evaluations are to be done here:
Final exam writing project is due by Wednesday at noon by Turnitin. MAKE IT VERY CLEAR ON YOUR ASSIGNMENT IF YOU ARE, OR HOPE TO BE, A GRADUATING SENIOR.
Course evaluations are to be done here:
http://www.morehouse.edu/course-evaluations
Monday, April 28, 2014
Final paper assignment, again
Final paper:
Due at time of final exam, which is Monday, May 5 at 1-3 PM. Please come prepared to briefly present your paper to the class.
Due by Turnitin also. (No Turnitin = no grade).
Present and explain at least two of the main arguments from Craig and Sinnott-Armstrong and their responses to each other's arguments. THESE MAIN ARGUMENTS SHOULD ALL BE DIFFERENT ARGUMENTS: SO, TWO ARGUMENTS FROM ONE THINKER AND TWO DIFFERENT ARGUMENTS FROM THE OTHER THINKER. NO ARGUMENT SHOULD BE THE SAME. (So, e.g., present and explain at least two of Craig's main arguments and Sinnott-Armstrong's response to those exact arguments, and vice versa). Explain who makes a better case for his overal conclusion(s) and why.
Your paper should have a clear and straightforward introduction.
It should have clearly marked sections.
It should have a proper conclusion, that summarizes what you did in the paper.
It should be written, as Pryor says, for an audience who knows nothing about these topics.
Your paper should conform to all the guidance on writing, and writing philosophy, you've been given in this course.
Due at time of final exam, which is Monday, May 5 at 1-3 PM. Please come prepared to briefly present your paper to the class.
Due by Turnitin also. (No Turnitin = no grade).
Present and explain at least two of the main arguments from Craig and Sinnott-Armstrong and their responses to each other's arguments. THESE MAIN ARGUMENTS SHOULD ALL BE DIFFERENT ARGUMENTS: SO, TWO ARGUMENTS FROM ONE THINKER AND TWO DIFFERENT ARGUMENTS FROM THE OTHER THINKER. NO ARGUMENT SHOULD BE THE SAME. (So, e.g., present and explain at least two of Craig's main arguments and Sinnott-Armstrong's response to those exact arguments, and vice versa). Explain who makes a better case for his overal conclusion(s) and why.
Your paper should have a clear and straightforward introduction.
It should have clearly marked sections.
It should have a proper conclusion, that summarizes what you did in the paper.
It should be written, as Pryor says, for an audience who knows nothing about these topics.
Your paper should conform to all the guidance on writing, and writing philosophy, you've been given in this course.
Wednesday, April 23, 2014
Reading for Monday with our guest speaker on Islam:
https://www.dropbox.com/s/l40cx853z0zupp4/Esposito%20-%20what%20you%20should%20know%20about%20Islam.PDF
Final exam schedule:
http://tigernet.morehouse.edu/oit/pdf/Spring2014Exam.pdf
For Friday, we will continue with the Craig-Sinnott-Armstrong book.
https://www.dropbox.com/s/l40cx853z0zupp4/Esposito%20-%20what%20you%20should%20know%20about%20Islam.PDF
Questions from Dr. King to prepare answers for:
1) What do Muslims believe?
2) What does Islam say about poverty and social justice?
3) Are there any divisions in Islam
Question from Dr. Nobis:
4) Should *you* be a Muslim? Why or why not?
Final exam schedule:
http://tigernet.morehouse.edu/oit/pdf/Spring2014Exam.pdf
For Friday, we will continue with the Craig-Sinnott-Armstrong book.
Monday, April 21, 2014
Change of plans for this Wednesday:
Roundtable Discussion:23 April 2014 @ 11:00, Merrill Seminar Room.
Roundtable Discussion:23 April 2014 @ 11:00, Merrill Seminar Room.
“What is the relationship between science and religion?”
Panel Participants:
Lycurgus L. Muldrow, PhD., Director of Sponsored Research and Integrative Activities, Division of Science and Mathematics, Morehouse College.
Nathan Nobis, PhD., Department of Philosophy and Religion, Morehouse College.
Harold Bennett, PhD., Chair, Department of Philosophy and Religion, Morehouse College.
Duane Jackson, PhD., Department of Psychology, Morehouse College.
And Dr. Troy Story, presiding. Our panelists will make reference to the following links, provided by Dr. Muldrow.
Episode 1: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yro5QGf91kU
Episode 2: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HELdTTP3A0Y
Episode 3: http://youtu.be/mllHb6Dd5dU
Episode 4: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h2EdJ4Tt-_g
Episode 5: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y7jlf7UY-ns
Episode 6: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Upv-QUgbdqs
Friday we will return to the God? book, chapter 4: we will skip chapter 3 (Craig's response to Sinnott-Armstrong) and skip chapter 6 (Sinnott-Armstrong's response to Craig's) and leave that for you to read and evaluate on your own.
Monday, April 14, 2014
Wednesday: Ch. 1 of the God debate book.
Today we started this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8A3Sdw2Eig
Today we started this video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8A3Sdw2Eig
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)