For Wednesday and Friday, we will be moving on to Ch. 10 "God and
Morality" in the Stairs book. Please carefully read that chapter so you
are familiar with the isues and arguments. There is some overlap with
chapter 1 regarding what it means to say that the concept of God is that of an all good, morally perfect being who never does wrong.
Today
ya'll turned in a draft of your "a criticism of Harris" paper and we
discussed three sample papers. I hope that these in-class paper review
sessions give you better ideas how to review, critique and improve your
own writings.
Since I would like to get your previous paper back
before I ask you to resubmit this new paper, just keep revising and
improving your new "a criticism of Harris" paper until further notice.
It will likely all be due next Monday, I suspect.
Thanks!
Monday, October 1, 2012
Thursday, September 27, 2012
Wednesday, September 26, 2012
For Monday,
For next Monday, Oct.1, a detailed summary OR OUTLINE of the next two chapters of Vaughn, 4 and 5 are due in class and via Turnitin. If you did not do a detailed summary OR OUTLINE of Chapter 3, I encourage you to revisit that.
Also, more importantly, another short paper:
You have written a paper on Harris where you present three of his main claims and some of the reasons he gives in his favor.
Now, your task is to do some online research and
You do not yet have to explain whether this objection is a good one or not.
Your writing should be clear, well organized, and simple. It should be easy to follow. It should conform to all the guidance from Vaughn.
For next Monday, Oct.1, a detailed summary OR OUTLINE of the next two chapters of Vaughn, 4 and 5 are due in class and via Turnitin. If you did not do a detailed summary OR OUTLINE of Chapter 3, I encourage you to revisit that.
Also, more importantly, another short paper:
You have written a paper on Harris where you present three of his main claims and some of the reasons he gives in his favor.
Now, your task is to do some online research and
- find discussions of Harris (check Google, Google scholar and other sources);
- find discussion of at least one of the claims that you discuss in your paper;
- find critical discussion of at least one of these claims, that is, arguments that Harris's claim is false and/or that Harris's argument(s) for that claim are unsound (see Vaughn for what that term means) or otherwise bad arguments.This critical discussion must include reasons given in favor of this objection. So, you are looking for a developed, well-reasoned, defended objection to Harris: not a mere assertion.
You do not yet have to explain whether this objection is a good one or not.
Your writing should be clear, well organized, and simple. It should be easy to follow. It should conform to all the guidance from Vaughn.
Monday, September 24, 2012
Hi,
As discussed in class today, the revision on the "three claims by Harris" paper is due Wednesday. Please see the blog for guidance on how to improve your paper, as well as the Vaughn book.
Wednesday we will finish up chapter 1 of the Stairs book.
For Friday, please find criticisms of Harris online that address some of the claim(s) you discuss in your paper. Bring it to class.
For next Monday, Oct.1, a detailed summary of the next two chapters of Vaughn, 4 and 5 are due in class and via Turnitin.
Thanks,
NN
As discussed in class today, the revision on the "three claims by Harris" paper is due Wednesday. Please see the blog for guidance on how to improve your paper, as well as the Vaughn book.
Wednesday we will finish up chapter 1 of the Stairs book.
For Friday, please find criticisms of Harris online that address some of the claim(s) you discuss in your paper. Bring it to class.
For next Monday, Oct.1, a detailed summary of the next two chapters of Vaughn, 4 and 5 are due in class and via Turnitin.
Thanks,
NN
Saturday, September 22, 2012
Here is a reminder of this extra credit assignment that as on the syllabus; click on the link to see the document (with pictures):
https://docs.google.com/open? id=1TKXEcQS1D5AJ_ PwKf8T3UWgHdXtOkNcNTrSmlrdQ_ U2vP7FXdpXwmTLAHDW0
“Don’t ask what the world needs. Ask what makes you come alive, and go do it.
Because what the world needs is people who have come alive.” ― Howard Thurman
Hi,
Some philosophers of religion stopped by yesterday to discuss their papers. Here are some quick suggestions:
Always put your email address on your written work. That way I can more easily contact you with feedback.
You were asked to find three *main claims* that Harris makes and supports in his book. Many students did not really do that: either they mentioned various *issues or topics* that Harris discusses -- but did not mention the claims he makes about those issues or topics (e.g., e.g., "About this topic his main claim is that ______) or they presented various minor claims Harris makes. Again, you want to find three main claims and explain them clearly, and briefly summarize the reasons he gives in favor of these themes. And you want to present these in a way that someone who has not read the book would understand them.
I encourage you to try to write SIMPLY: write in short sentences -- break up any long sentences -- and so not use any uncommon, fancy words unless no ordinary words will do the job. Again, I encourage you to break up any long sentences into shorter ones: I GUARANTEE this will improve your writing: this is what journalists do, to make their writings more readable.
Each paragraph should be focused on one topic: you should be able to say, "This paragraph is about this: ____."
Don't use the word 'feel', e.g., "Harris feels that ____." Use believes, thinks, or argues, since rarely will anyone be talking about their feelings or emotions in a philosophy paper.
Do not write "Well" as in, "Well, this argument is ___." No "wells."
Please carefully read the Vaughn book, since there is much in it that will help improve your writing. And there is an outlining/summarizing summary on the first three chapters due Monday.
OK, these are a few quick thoughts!
Thanks, NN
Friday, September 14, 2012
Some new assignments:
This Monday (9/17), your "intellectual notes" on Harris's book are due.
Wednesday we will discuss chapter 1 of A Thinker's Guide to Philosophy of Religion on Concepts of God. Please read that chapter and the Introduction.
For Friday (9/21), please write a short paper that summarizes three of the main claims that Harris makes in his book, as well as the reasons he gives in favor of those claims. Your paper should have an introduction that tells the reader what you will do in the paper. Your purpose here it to accurately state and explain some of Harris's views and his arguments in favor of those views. There should be no evaluation or criticisms of his views or arguments in this paper; that will be the next step.
For the next Monday (9/24), please read Vaughn Chapters. 1 -3 (1-2 have already been assigned) and write a detailed summary of the chapters. Submit these via Turnitin.com and in hardcopy.
This Monday (9/17), your "intellectual notes" on Harris's book are due.
Wednesday we will discuss chapter 1 of A Thinker's Guide to Philosophy of Religion on Concepts of God. Please read that chapter and the Introduction.
For Friday (9/21), please write a short paper that summarizes three of the main claims that Harris makes in his book, as well as the reasons he gives in favor of those claims. Your paper should have an introduction that tells the reader what you will do in the paper. Your purpose here it to accurately state and explain some of Harris's views and his arguments in favor of those views. There should be no evaluation or criticisms of his views or arguments in this paper; that will be the next step.
I would like 3 students to volunteer to get me their papers by 9 AM that day so I can get them photocopied for us to read, discuss and make suggestions for improvement in class that day.
For the next Monday (9/24), please read Vaughn Chapters. 1 -3 (1-2 have already been assigned) and write a detailed summary of the chapters. Submit these via Turnitin.com and in hardcopy.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)